“The Gamers of Today May Be the Leaders of Tomorrow”

Rethinking Education

Rethinking Education in the Age of Technology, by Allan Collins and Richard Halverson

I’m preparing for a parent presentation on video games, learning, and kids. It’s a subject I’ve wanted to bring to a parent meeting for a number of years, and I’m excited to finally have it scheduled on the calendar.

Here’s my basic outline:

  1. Inoculate – basically address some of the common objections outright and diffuse potential defensiveness
  2. Reframe the discussion of video games: why do kids like them? (spoiler: it’s not because they are easy)
  3. What can games teach us about learning? (Overview of the research and history of games in learning and flow)
  4. Discuss common ways we denigrate or undervalue gaming, many times without even realizing it

I’m hoping to weave in lots of examples from Minecraftedu and SimCity, since those are the two video games we currently use in our curriculum. (Although it could be argued both of these are not the typical video games people think of. Minecraft is really more of a sandbox/creative tool and SimCity is an open-ended simulation tool.)

Stay tuned for a post of resources for my presentation!

I’m taking this opportunity to return to a book I read last spring, Rethinking Education in the Age of Technology, by Allan Collins and Richard Halverson. Just as with It’s Complicated, I’ll include some quotes, but know that the items that I pulled out specifically relate to my presentation on video games and don’t represent the entirety of the book.

  • My biggest picture observation is that we are in a time of enormous change in the structure of education, and educators have little control of this, which is probably why things are actually changing. Educators are conservative in their practice because of the design of the system. Change is upon us, whether it’s the internet, the computers, the nature of globalization and global problems, or the homeschool communities. I think this is exciting!
  • Watch a kid do math problems for homework. Watch a kid play a video game. When we know they are learning through the video game, why do we still feel in our gut that the math problems are more valuable? How did the popular culture and media so convince us into the idea that school and learning must be serious in order to be effective?

Notes from the book:

p. 9: 2 key arguments by technology enthusiasts:
1. “the world is changing and we will need to adapt schooling to prepare students for the changing world they are entering.

2. “technology gives us enhanced capabilities for educating learners, and … schools should embrace these capabilities to reshape education.”

Continue reading ““The Gamers of Today May Be the Leaders of Tomorrow””

It’s Complicated, by danah boyd

It’s Complicated: The social lives of networked teens, by danah boyd

I just did a power read through of this book in order to pass it on to a friend before spring break. Wow. It is right on with what our tech department is saying and so important for parents and educators to read!

My biggest takeaways:

  1. Kids are doing what they’ve always done, technology just makes it look different, BUT technology does afford new possibilities, so some things may actually be different.
  2. Adults need to be engaged in social media with kids, but not always/everywhere and not as stalkers/surveillance, and kids need more geographic freedom and free time.
  3. Social networks online mirror social networks in real life, which are generally drawn along racial and socioeconomic lines, but even moreso. If an independent school is truly interested in increasing the socioeconomic diversity of its student body, it’s going to have to engage in the conversations with students about social media, because that will play a huge part in whether new students can navigate, adapt, and feel accepted in the new school while still preserving their identity in their non school community.
  4. Context collapse.

Here are some important points/quotes that I pulled out: Continue reading “It’s Complicated, by danah boyd”

Book Review: Sticks and Stones, by Emily Bazelon

Side note: I used Evernote on my phone to take notes while I read. Because I was traveling and rarely reading in the same place, my phone was something always close by. I was able to type in quotes when I wanted or take pictures of paragraphs. I would love to see our students take advantage of this kind of resource gathering or curating.

Our critical friends group decided to read a book together this summer and put together a LONG list, but eventually we settled on Sticks and Stones, by Emily Bazelon. Since our group has teachers from PreK to Seniors, social/emotional dynamics came out as a common topic that applied to everyone.

I’m glad that I personally read it, rather than just listening to a summary or review on the radio. It was valuable to me to read the complicated stories of the three kids because it broke down the media sound bites that I remember. I think Bazelon does an excellent job of making it clear how complicated each tale is.

A few quotes that resonated with me:

  • As I always suspected, Bazelon states earlier on, “The internet and the cell phone don’t cause bullying on their own … and they haven’t created a new breed of bullies.” (10)
  • The FCD folks who come visit once per year have also talked about social norming, so this wasn’t new for me, but a good reminder nonetheless:  “The idea is that students often overestimate how much other kids drink and drive, and when they find out that it’s less prevalent that they think – outlier behavior rather than the norm – they’re less likely to do it themselves….. Bullying, too, isn’t the norm…. when kids understand that concerted cruelty is the exception and not the rule, they respond: bullying drops, and students become more active about reporting it.” (13)
  • “Teenagers, and even young kids, have to have their private spaces. It’s a tricky balance to strike, the line between protecting kids and policing them.” (13) Yes yes yes. And I will probably freak out about it when my son is a teenager too.
  • I LOVE this: Delete day! Students held an event in the computer lab for people to come in and get help deleting unwanted social media tags, photos, posts, etc. and possibly even deleting accounts on websites such as Formspring. (290)
  • “The research showed that news outlets frequently give no useful information about how to prevent bullying, even as they call it “epidemic” – false – and portray it as the biggest problem kids face today – also false.” (297) Can I make myself remember this next time a sensationalist story comes along?
  • From researcher danah boyd: “the kids who live in places where physical roaming is more restricted who tend to socialize the most online.” (306) I’m most fascinated by this from a parenting point of view. Where do I need to live in order to provide space for my child to roam? This is more of a personal link, but I like the resources on Free Range Kids.

I used to be frustrated that schools were asked to “solve” bullying. “We all need to share the load – whereas at the moment, we’re mainly asking schools to shoulder it.” (16) But after reading this, I’ve come to the conclusion that schools are the only communal organization anymore that can reach most kids in a community, so it makes the most sense for schools to take the lead on this. Arguably, the first and foremost goal of schools is to help kids grow into healthy adults. Our mission at Oregon Episcopal School specifically states, “by inspiring intellectual, physical, social, emotional, artistic, and spiritual growth.”

This may be my number one takeaway: the importance of establishing a positive community for the healthy growth of all its members.

Bazelon comes back to this at the end where she states that developing “character and empathy” (305) are the most crucial things we can do as parents and teachers to proactively address bullying, not to mention improve student success (however you want to define success).

Overall, this book has been a positive affirmation of the independent international school where I grew up and the two independent schools where I have taught. These small communities, where each individual is known and cared for, provide the foundation for all other pursuits. I realize now how much I took that for granted in my first years of teaching as I focused almost exclusively on academics.

I appreciate the candor and humanness with which Bazelon approaches this subject, which is quite messy and emotionally loaded. One of my favorite phrases recently has been “the human condition,” when I’ve been faced with messy interpersonal relationships. Maybe it helps me feel like we are all in this together.

Back to blogging… and Books

At 9 weeks post partum, I’m beginning to think about going back to work. I’m so thankful to have this special time with our new son and have been cherishing every busy minute. But I will return to work (work outside the home, that is) after thanksgiving, and I’m beginning to look forward to it.

Babies do not give you long stretches of interrupted time, so I’m committing to writing shorter posts but more often. For the next few weeks, I’m going to try to pull from education books that I’ve read and share quotes or key ideas that have influenced my teaching or thinking.

#1. Last Child in the Woods, by Richard Louv

I read this probably 5 years ago, but it still sits on my shelf and definitely influences how I feel about kids and nature. My number one takeaway? Teach kids to love being in nature. Whenever we have service learning pulling ivy, or a class visit to the wetlands, it can feel like work. They need time to play and explore, get muddy and laugh.

Louv talks about “useful boredom” (p.62) when kids sit in a car staring out the window, noticing everything out there. Now that I’m a parent, I definitely understand the desire to keep a child constantly occupied, lest they fuss or cry.

He also emphasizes the need to teach about the environment, not just its problems (p.134), because who wants to just think about all the bad things? That’s not the way to get kids to care. I suppose this applies to more than just nature – if you always approach topics from a sad, “problem” kind of outlook, kids will disassociate.

There are obviously lots more lessons in this book and maybe I’ll go back and read it sometime, but these are the thoughts that have stayed with me.

Motivated to Learn

Wouldn’t life be some much easier if we could figure out how to inspire student motivation? Are we (as teachers) motivated to teach and to learn?

Deborah Stipek is a professor at Stanford and wrote Motivation to Learn (2001). We talked about her research at the Klingenstein Summer Institute. I think one reason it resonated so strongly with me was it took psychology theory and put it into practice, and explained things that I was seeing in my students.

She gives factors that influence intrinsic motivation:

  1. Need for a sense of competency
  2. Need for sense of self-determination
  3. Need for interpersonal connection
  4. Need for sense of purpose, meaning, or relevance
  5. Interest
Let’s look at the most successful unit I have ever taught: Understanding Systems using SimCity:
  1. Students followed tutorials and saw growth of their cities, and they got frequent feedback from the game to develop their competency.
  2. Students got complete control over their own city.
  3. Many students helped each other – it was rare for the classroom to be quiet – and all the chatter was about the game using the systems vocabulary.  All the chatter was about the game. They were connecting about the project.
  4. This was linked to our yearlong theme of systems and sustainability.
  5. Games are fun – there is a natural interest to seeing what the reaction is to your action.
I don’t have any evidence to back up these claims that this is why the unit was successful, but it makes an awful lot of sense to me. Each kid may not have connected to all five factors, but enough of them connected to a couple. And it jives with what I felt in my classroom.
  1. How do you make your students feel competent? What feedback do you provide? What feedback to they hear?
  2. How do you give them self-determination? What choices do they have? What real choices do they have?
  3. How do you allow them to connect with each other and you?
  4. What purpose or relevance do they see in assignments? (This does not have to be that they are saving the world…)
  5. Are they interested? Are you interested?
Thoughts?
Image credit: Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi’s conception of Flow, from Hill Holliday’s Blog: http://www.hhcc.com/blog/2009/11/building-discovery-in-web-design/